Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sucker hole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:47, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sucker hole

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems like a fairly unremarkable and unexpandable dicdef, largely unsourced. No objection to merging if an appropriate target can be found, but I see nothing meriting an article here. BD2412 T 23:47, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. BD2412 T 23:47, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge to Glossary of nautical terms (A-L) or Spatial disorientation or possibly Aviation safety or any other relevant articles. The aviation term has some very limited coverage in sources, but not enough I think to warrant its own article, and it can fit into other articles. --Tristario (talk)
Delete No support in the article; I have never come across the term Flibbertigibbets (talk) 01:50, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.